传统验证流程：耗时低效
独立开发者平均花 30+ 小时手工调研，却仍然充满不确定性
传统方式
手工调研 30+ 小时
- ✕手动爬取 Reddit/HN/IH 讨论帖
- ✕逐条阅读评论，主观判断痛点
- ✕用 Excel 整理数据，容易遗漏
- ✕靠直觉估算竞争格局与定价
- ✕撰写 PRD 再花 2-3 天
- ✕最终结论依然缺乏数据支撑
Build Cleverly
20 分钟完成决策
- 自动抓取多平台真实讨论数据
- AI 语义分析 200+ 条用户证据
- 6 维评分，每项都有来源可追溯
- WTP 硬门槛过滤，避免自我欺骗
- 自动生成 PRD 与替代方向
- Ship / Rework / Skip 清晰判断
4 步完成完整验证
输入 Idea
填写 idea 标题、目标用户、假设痛点、定价区间，选择要抓取的平台
表单填写 < 5 分钟抓取讨论
自动从 Reddit、Hacker News、Indie Hackers 等社区抓取相关讨论
200+ 条真实数据AI 评分
6 维度深度分析：市场需求、痛点深度、支付意愿、竞争空间、ICP 清晰度、上线速度
每项均可溯源输出决策
Ship / Rework / Skip 结论，附带 PRD 草稿、定价建议、替代方向
含替代路径每个结论都有据可查
不是 AI 黑箱——每条证据都可追溯。每个评分背后都有真实的社区讨论数据支撑。
"I've been looking for exactly this. My team wastes so much time on manual research for every new feature idea. Would pay $30/mo for something that automates this."
"The problem with most validation tools is they don't show you the actual evidence. This one does, and that makes all the difference for building trust."
"Spent 3 weeks researching my last project only to discover nobody wanted to pay for it. A tool like this could have saved me so much time and money."
"The WTP (willingness to pay) signal is the most important metric and most tools completely ignore it. Glad someone is finally addressing this properly."
"Not sure about the pricing accuracy. These AI tools sometimes hallucinate market data. Would need to see the methodology before trusting the numbers."
"Competitor analysis is already saturated. Unless you have a really unique insight or angle, it's going to be very hard to differentiate here."
↑ 实际证据卡片预览。每条引用均包含来源链接、原始日期和相关度评分。
失败不是终点，而是转折
Skip 结果不是拒绝，而是引导到更可行的方向
传统验证工具
- ✕只给出 Yes/No，没有原因
- ✕失败后不知道下一步怎么做
- ✕数据来源不透明
- ✕单一结论，没有替代路径
- ✕评分维度单一，缺乏深度
- 6 维评分 + 每项证据引用
- Skip 后自动生成 4-5 个替代方向
- 每个数字都有来源锚点可追溯
- 一键用替代方向重新分析
- WTP 硬门槛过滤，拒绝自我欺骗
完成分析
平均每次抓取讨论数
用户认为评分可信
完成首次分析平均时间