Don't Build Blind.
Validate First.
Use real community discussion evidence, 6-dimension AI scoring, and automated documentation to turn vague intuitions into Ship / Rework / Skip decisions.
20 min vs. 30 hours of manual work.
AI Score Report
AI Writing Assistant for Indie Devs
Overall Score
Traditional validation: slow & inefficient
Indie developers spend 30+ hours on manual research, yet still face uncertainty
Traditional Way
30+ Hours Manual Research
- ✕Manually scrape Reddit/HN/IH discussions
- ✕Read comments one by one, subjectively judge pain points
- ✕Organize data in Excel, easy to miss insights
- ✕Guess competitive landscape and pricing by intuition
- ✕Spend another 2-3 days writing a PRD
- ✕Final conclusions still lack data support
Build Cleverly
Decisions in 20 Minutes
- Auto-crawl real discussions from multiple platforms
- AI semantic analysis of 200+ user evidence points
- 6-dimension scoring, every item traceable to source
- WTP hard threshold filters, avoid self-deception
- Auto-generate PRDs and alternative directions
- Clear Ship / Rework / Skip judgment
4 Steps to Complete Validation
Input Idea
Fill in your idea title, target users, assumed pain points, pricing range, and select platforms to scrape
< 5 min formCrawl Discussions
Automatically scrape relevant discussions from Reddit, Hacker News, Indie Hackers, and more
200+ real data pointsAI Scoring
6-dimension deep analysis: Market Demand, Pain Depth, WTP, Competition Gap, ICP Clarity, Launch Feasibility
All items traceableGet Decision
Ship / Rework / Skip conclusion with PRD draft, pricing recommendations, and alternative directions
Includes alternativesEvery Conclusion, Source-Backed
Not an AI black box — a traceable chain of evidence. Every score is backed by real community discussions.
"I've been looking for exactly this. My team wastes so much time on manual research for every new feature idea. Would pay $30/mo for something that automates this."
"The problem with most validation tools is they don't show you the actual evidence. This one does, and that makes all the difference for building trust."
"Spent 3 weeks researching my last project only to discover nobody wanted to pay for it. A tool like this could have saved me so much time and money."
"The WTP (willingness to pay) signal is the most important metric and most tools completely ignore it. Glad someone is finally addressing this properly."
"Not sure about the pricing accuracy. These AI tools sometimes hallucinate market data. Would need to see the methodology before trusting the numbers."
"Competitor analysis is already saturated. Unless you have a really unique insight or angle, it's going to be very hard to differentiate here."
↑ Actual evidence card preview. Each citation includes source link, original date, and relevance score.
Failure Is Not the End — It's a Pivot
A Skip result isn't rejection — it's guidance toward a more viable direction.
Traditional Validation Tools
- ✕Only gives Yes/No, no reasons why
- ✕No guidance on what to do after failure
- ✕Data sources are opaque
- ✕Single conclusion, no alternative paths
- ✕One-dimensional scoring, lacks depth
- 6-dimension scoring + every item cited
- Auto-generates 4-5 alternative directions on Skip
- Every number has a source anchor you can trace
- One-click reanalysis with alternative directions
- WTP hard threshold filter, rejects self-deception
Real Cases, Side-by-Side
AI Writing Assistant for Indie Developers
Overall Score
Strong demand signals on Reddit and Indie Hackers for such a tool, clear WTP signals ($20-40/mo), and room for differentiation in the competitive landscape.
General NFT Minting Platform
Overall Score
Extremely weak WTP signals, 73% negative sentiment in discussions, highly saturated competitive landscape. But discovered an adjacent direction: copyright attestation for small creators.
Analyses Completed
Avg Discussions per Analysis
Users Find Scoring Credible
Avg Time to First Analysis